Well we beat buffalo and miami. If we can beat Pitt that should take care of the other wild card contenders minus Baltimore, Cincinnati. One of them will probably win the division anyway [Reply]
Originally Posted by the Talking Can:
you can't lose to tennessee and oakland and be taken seriously
Nothing matters but getting into the playoffs. If Eli and the Giants could win from the wild card, anybody can win from the wild card. First you get in, then you see what happens. Stranger things have happened. Just helps if you have a stout D and a top QB. But never say never. I mean, if you have a solid team. If you just out and out suck, then yeah, never. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Kaepernick:
Nothing matters but getting into the playoffs. If Eli and the Giants could win from the wild card, anybody can win from the wild card. First you get in, then you see what happens. Stranger things have happened. Just helps if you have a stout D and a top QB. But never say never. I mean, if you have a solid team. If you just out and out suck, then yeah, never.
The Chiefs aren't making the playoffs. Losibg to the Raiders will be a reason why. [Reply]
Breakdown: A tough outing for McGlynn who struggled against the run for the most part before developing a complete inability to handle a stunting Khalil Mack on the Chiefs’ final drive. You don’t normally see a linemen off his feet so much in pass protection. Colts fans won’t be surprised to see how McGlynn has performed, because for all the toughness he brings he remains the biggest liability on the line.
Signature Stat: His five hurries allowed represent a season worst, while he’s now given up penalties in four consecutive games after not allowing one prior to that.
Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave:
Reid has a PHO for McGlynn.
I think we'll have to watch that shit bird play the rest of the season. I'm rooting for an injury.
He is this year's Kendrick Lewis. It seems like every year there is one player who totally sucks that they refuse to bench even though we have better alternatives. [Reply]